Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Roger R's avatar

"I genuinely think the reason why online gambling isn't as controversial as it could be is because it just doesn't trigger the same disgust response that matters of food and sex do."

That's a major factor for sure, but I think there's at least one other one. Gambling was normalized long before *normalized* was a thing. So gambling *feels* like it took off organically, without needing to be promoted by governments or schools or HR initiatives. Yes, it's advertised heavily, but the advertisements don't have any *moral* aspect to them. They don't say "this is good (morally)", they say "this is a good time!" So the ads don't come off as lectures or even argumentative, so they're less provocative to those who disagree with them.

This is in sharp contrast to matters of food and sex. After all, is there a *gambling* positivity movement, which promotes the idea of "your wallet is healthy at any size"?

Still, maybe we're too lax with gambling ads. Most sports fans I know dislike seeing them on TV broadcasts of sporting events. I dislike them a little bit since it sometimes feel like sports betting becomes bigger than the sport itself.

red hot ice queen's avatar

Do you see gambling as something that stands as a cultural fixture, even with the addiction and destruction involved? I have a grandparent that lives near a big horseracing track. He has been horsebetting his whole life as a hobby, but hasn't blown any major assets as far as I know. Some do - and I think horseracing is wrong for other reasons - but thousands of people visit the town during racing season, have a great time, and go home. People get something out of the experience even if they're losing money. I feel similarly about Las Vegas

No posts

Ready for more?